During the protracted custody fight between Davido and Sophia Momodu, the singer’s cousin, Folasade Adeleke, clashes with a troll who claims she abandoned her children with her baby daddy.
This came amid the public turmoil surrounding Imade Adeleke’s shared custody bid, which was met with a long list of reasons why she would not be safe in Davido’s care.
Taking to the X platform to voice opinion on the matter, Davido’s cousin emphasized the bias of netizens who sided with Sophia, who wanted sole custody while receiving full support from the musician.
“It’s God that will judge you!” she wrote.
However, a troll blasted her for making such a statement despite abandoning her children with her baby daddy.
“God will judge you more, you to leave your children for your baby daddy, you evil people like supporting bad things, when your cousin lied against her that marijuana was found in Imade blood and your family wanted to run with Imade God did not judge you all matchewww,” the troll wrote.
In response, Folasade Adeleke denied the claims of abandonment and stated that her children are on vacation with their father.
“My kids are currently on summer vacation with their dads family . You dumb ass bitch . Don’t @ me when you don’t know wtf is going on. You are wasting your credit ! Evil is evil,” she noted.
In related news, amid the custody battle over Imade Adeleke, prominent businesswoman Sophia Momodu explains why their daughter is not secure with her father, Davido.
This happened after Sophia submitted a counter-102-paragraph declaration challenging Davido’s plea for shared custody of their kid.
In the affidavit presented by her legal team, Dr Anthony Idigbe SAN of Punuka Attorneys and Dr Bimpe Ajegbomogun, the mother of one, indicated why Imade is safer with her.
She described how Davido lost his kid, Ifeanyi Adeleke, in a sad home accident roughly two years ago, among other reasons.
Sophia Momodu explains why Davido should not have shared custody of their baby.
The counter affidavit reads in part;
“The Applicant is an artist who always travels around the world as mandated by his career and cannot possibly be with our daughter at crucial times.
“The Applicant is married to another woman, and they live together. The proper upbringing of our daughter by another cannot be guaranteed.
“The fact that the Applicant lost his son in his house in rather unfortunate and questionable circumstances shows that our daughter cannot be placed in the custody of the Applicant.”
“That I know as a fact that the Applicant is not fit to be granted custody of our daughter because he is not available and does not possess the ability to dutifully care for her.”
“She explained that her relationship with the Applicant begun in 2014 which led to the birth of their daughter in the year 2015, “that we broke up in the year 2017 and sometimes in 2020 we made up and the relationship was finally ended in 2022”.
“According to her, throughout the checkered history of their relationship, she had always attempted to break up with the Applicant as “I was tired of his lies and unfaithfulness, but he always used the withdrawal of his fatherly duties and maintenance for our daughter as a pawn to force me to resume the sexual relationship with him.”
