- Nigerian lawyer Emeka Ugwuonye has criticized those targeting his client, May Edochie, through her daughter, Danielle Edochie.
- Ugwuonye criticized the manipulation of Danielle’s remarks to serve a malicious agenda and criticized May’s parenting. He argued that Danielle’s views were shaped independently, reflecting her mature perspective on her father’s actions, rather than any influence from her mother.
- He condemned the critics for their relentless efforts to undermine May Edochie and used Danielle as a pawn in their broader scheme to discredit and disparage her.
Emeka Ugwuonye, a Nigerian lawyer with a personal interest in the high-stakes drama involving Nollywood star Yul Edochie, has launched a scathing assault on those attacking his client, May Edochie, via her daughter, Danielle Edochie.
In a heated post on his company’s official Instagram page, Ugwuonye revealed the terrible truth of how Danielle’s recent statements were manipulated to fulfill a malevolent goal, resulting in harsh condemnation of May’s parenting.
Ugwuonye passionately refuted these accusations, claiming that Danielle’s opinions were formed independently, reflecting her mature viewpoint on the chaos produced by her father’s conduct rather than any influence from her mother.
He chastised the detractors for their unrelenting attempts to destroy May Edochie, using Danielle as a pawn in a larger plot to discredit and denigrate her.
Read His Full Statement Below;
“PEOPLE CRITICIZING DANIELLE YUL-EDOCHIE ARE SIMPLY INSENSITIVE, UNINFORMED, AND WORSE,
Those criticizing the Yul Edochie’s daughter for her comment on social media are simply unable to place such a comment in the proper context. And those trying to blame Queen May for the comment of her grown daughter are just desperate for a new angle of attack. Queen May has defied every death wish. She has survived the most vicious campaign of hate.
Those who thought she was finished a couple of years ago must have been dumbfounded by her resilience and grace as they watched her triumph over adversity that would have crushed most people in similar situation.
The false outcry over Danielle’s comment is just another way to attack the victim.,Daniel is now an adult (young adult). She was a senior teenager when her father, Yul Edochie, turned their world upside down and plunged their family into a vortex of unsavory public and media attention.
Danielle is both a witness and a victim of her father’s extreme conduct. What Yul Edochie did was not just an aberration but a near total derailment of the destiny of his family.
What you did not realize is that when Yul betrayed his wife by engaging in a secret affair with another woman for six years to the point of raising a secret family, it was not just his wife that he betrayed. It was not just his wife that he abandoned.
He also abandoned and betrayed his children, including Danielle. At her age, Danielle was in a good enough position to personally and directly absorb the shock and trauma unleashed on her by her father.
To expect that she would not have an independent assessment of what happened or to expect that she would praise her father despite what happened is plain idiocy.,May cannot be responsible for how Danielle feels toward her father.
And it will be unfair to expect May to whitewash what happened and give the children the false impression that their father behaved well. Indeed, it is illogical to expect a woman who has filed to divorce her husband to be at the same time telling her children that their father was a gentleman without a fault. They will ask her: “Then why are you in court, mom, if dad were a gentleman”